English French German Italian Portuguese Russian Spanish
The Reason Why Police Detention Produces Negative Consequence

The Reason Why Police Detention Produces Negative Consequence

There are quite a few questions about the responsibilities that police have regarding to detention. It is usually said that those responsibilities depend on the circumstances and on the territory in which the detention or detentions were executed. Conversely, this unawareness should not any longer keep being an issue of public concern considering that it affects some of the most important civil rights, for example: the right to liberty, the right to freedom of movement and the right to the proportional action of the public authorities. Social and civil rights should not be undermined by the public authorities as outlined by constitutional laws and regulations- nor should they in detention incidents. Therefore, this article will examine and deal with this precise concern with the goal of making clear the issues already pointed out.

Surprisingly, countless renowned attorneys and jurists have decided on the suitability of the complete accessibility to important information of taken into custody people. Police detention should no longer be a national authorities’ measure, they maintain. That means that it would not be suitable to normalize detentions as if they would not have unfavorable effects in detained people. Naturally this statement makes more sense when the detention derive from a feasible criminal demand, like the journalist Deniz Yucel’s detention on charges of propaganda inciting public violence. It's not at all difficult to realize that detentions have their economic costs for the State. For this and other reasons, police detainment rights should really be correctly described so as not to permit the interpreting of the Law be too lax.

When it comes to exercise different civil rights, every average citizen must certanly be aware of what the limits of these rights are. The very same occurs when public authority act. This is the explanation why the question "Do police have to tell you why you are being detained?" raises whenever we hear of a police detention. For example, it can be mentioned the detention of Paco Mula because he was presumed of trafficking with steroids and other substances for muscle advancement in gymnasiums. A while later, Spanish police officers made certain that he was aware of all his legal rights while detained. In cases like this, we can claim that police accomplished their obligations.

There are also other dilemmas and problems that concern citizens who have ben already arrested or fined long time ago. Usually people suspected of being implicated in a criminal offense or other illegal activities are uninformed of police detainment rights. Dalya Ofer, for instance, is an example of a person suspected of committing a criminal activity. The very same happens when the question "Does detention show up on your record?" arises. It is evident that recidivist criminals are punished a lot harder than those who had never committed a crime in their whole lifetime and that, subsequently, preceding detentions are not a good circumstance when the people arrested have to tackle a legal proceeding to answer for their prohibited actions or purposes.